|Agrimoney.com - http://www.agrimoney.com/features/marketreport.php?id=3923|
|AM markets: China tax fuels trade war talk, but ags unphased
By Mike Verdin - Published 11/01/2017
Is this the start of something worrying?
Some commentators were indeed seeing it as a pre-emptive strike China's increase to eye-watering levels its tariffs on imports of US distillers' grains (DDGs), a feed ingredient manufactured as a byproduct of corn (usually) ethanol output.
Chinese importers of DDGs will, for five years starting on Thursday, have to pay an anti-dumping duty of 42.2-53.7%, plus an 11.2-12% anti-subsidy tax, the country's Ministry of Commerce said.
That represents an increase from rates of 33.8% and 10-10.7% respectively which were introduced in September by China, which believes the workings of Washington policy and subsidies give the US an unfair advantage in DDGs trade.
This at a time when China is trying to erode its own huge stocks of corn (from which DDGs are derived, and which DDGs are used by some livestock producers to replace, although they are more usually seen, having elevated protein levels, as competitive with soymeal).
'Trade war begins'
This move may imply a back-up of DDGs in the US, curtailing domestic corn and soymeal use, unless traders can find alternative markets.
China imported 3.0m tonnes of DDGs in the first 11 months of last year, although that was a drop of 53%, as the country's initial moves to curb imports, and fear of duties, fed through.
(The US Grains Council, which promotes US grain exports, last week flagged success in opening up Irish and Israeli markets to "significant quantities" of DDGs and of corn gluten feed.)
What is more significant is whether Beijing's move represents a step towards the trade dislocations which Donald Trump's election as US president has appeared to make more likely.
"The China-US trade war begins," was how John Clemmow, at Barclays, headlined the story.
How this might play out in ags, of which the US is a big exporter, and China a huge importer, is not clear.
(For instance, China could not, even if it wanted to, meet all its soybean import needs without buying a large chunk from the US.)
If corn investors were worried about China's move, they weren't showing it in early deals, when Chicago's March contract was lower, but by a modest 0.2% to $3.57 ½ a bushel as of 09:40 UK time (03:40 Chicago time).
And the trade does have plenty of other issues to factor in, such as Thursday's slew of US Department of Agriculture data, including grain stocks statistics, which have a habit of sending prices swinging, besides the benchmark monthly Wasde world crop supply and demand report.
Furthermore, there is South American weather to consider too.
"South American weather forecasts are giving the trade a headache and have been the push and pull in the market over the past month," said Benson Quinn Commodities.
"The Brazilian outlook is improving with rains forecast across drier northern regions while an overly wet northern Argentina and dry southern Argentina could be leading to some crop losses."
Although the focus has been more on soybeans, "there will be some corn acres lost due to flooding in central Argentina," said Michael Cordonnier at Soybean and Corn Advisor, noting that the ideal sowing window for the grain has already closed.
"The corn impacted the most will be the latest planted corn that was still relatively small during the recent wet episodes."
Still, he forecast that Argentine corn area lost "would be less than 100,000 hectares" – significantly less than that for soybeans
"Combining the loses from flooding and drought, the 2016-17 Argentine soybean acreage could decline as much as 600,000 hectares or more from initial estimates or approximately 3%," Dr Cordonnier said.
Benson Quinn Commodities said that soybean futures "have found support as private analysts cut Argentine production and producer selling is absent from the market".
Argentina's Rosario Exchange pegged the domestic soybean crop at 52.5m tonnes, well below the 57.0m tonnes forecast by the USDA.
Chicago vs Dalian
Still, the worries were not enough to enable further headway in soybean futures in early deals, with Chicago's March lot easing by 0.1% to $10.12 ¾ a bushel, trapped between its 20-day moving average (to the upside) and the 200-day moving average regained in the last session.
Soybeans' decline was not helped by muted performances by the soybean processing products, with Chicago soymeal
for March easing 0.3% to $316.60 a short ton, and far underperforming the 1.3% rise to 2,810 yuan a tonne in the May contract on China's Dalian market.
(The diverging fortunes of these two contracts are consistent with ideas of shorter supplies of DDGs in China, and longer ones in the US.)
Chicago soyoil, meanwhile, edged 0.1% higher to 35.69 cents a pound, contrasting with a 1.7% rebound to 3,134 ringgit a tonne in prices of rival vegetable oil palm oil in Kuala Lumpur.
But then, soyoil did outperform in the last session, when palm oil prices were weighed by data showing bigger-than-expected Malaysian inventories.
'No significant damage'
Still, wheat proved the worst performer of Chicago's big three, falling 0.5% to $4.24 ½ a bushel for March delivery, and having trouble breaking above its 200-day moving average, on a continuous chart.
One potential ingredient for a wheat rally, evidence of cold or dryness damage to winter crops, is proving hard to pin down.
"Rain is still in the forecast for the southern Plains this weekend, while the Black Sea crop had enough snow coverage to escape significant damage from cold temperatures," Benson Quinn Commodities said.
Agritel concurred, saying that "low temperatures recorded in the Black Sea area should not impact too much winter crops, thanks to snow cover".
And while Europe is expecting cold weather next week too, that should not cause too many problems either.
'Upward trend intact'
Cotton fared better, adding 0.2% to 73.36 cents a pound in New York for March delivery, and recovering a few more of the losses incurred in Monday's reversal.
Traders at Ecom said that Thursday's Wasde report was "not expected to have any significant changes".
"This time around we may see a small increase in US production. However, this would be expected to be countered by an increase in use due to the continued fast pace of US export sales."
For now, "the market has found support at 72.80 cents a pound for the last two sessions keeping the recent upward trend intact".
|© Agrimoney 2017|