RSS
Twitter
Linked In
News In
Features
Linked In
RSS
https://twitter.com/Agrimoney
http://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Industry+Sectors/Agriculture

You are viewing 1 of your 2 complimentary articles.

Register now to receive full access.

Already registered?

Login | Join us now

Opinion: ADM should explain its China bank bet

Twitter Linkedin

Archer Daniels Midland owes its shareholders a better explanation of why it has

invested

in a Chinese bank.

It would be questionable enough for another bank to buy into the Agricultural Bank of China flotation, as Standard Chartered is reported to have done. But at least there is some defence of a potential cross-fertilization between two business of the same species.

For an

agribusiness group

such as ADM, the decision smacks of desperation. Of a willingness to pay a high price to avoid missing out on China.

Questionable investment

It is certainly hard to justify ADM's decision on pure investment grounds. Sure, the likes of Goldman Sachs and HSBC have made big profits on their stakes in Chinese banks. But they got in before prices soared.

Chinese banks now have fuller looking valuations, meaning the upside looks smaller. Meanwhile, the downside looks bigger, now that the country's economy is starting to look out of breath. Bank loan books in China have yet to receive the forensic examination that their recession-dented peers received in the West.

Besides,

ADM

should remember it is not a fund. If its shareholders want to invest in Chinese banks, they can do so themselves.

'Vantage point'

It may be that ADM must be expecting something else out of the deal. Such as leverage for opening Chinese doors.

Patricia Woertz, the company's chairman and chief executive, talks of the somewhat woolly benefit of an "important vantage point to identify and act on emerging opportunities".

But it's not clear why she needs an outlay of $100m to get decent Chinese business ideas, especially when it should already be getting some perspective through its Wilmar links.

Besides it is not clear how Agricultural Bank of China, or AgBank, is best placed in that regard.

Sure, the bank should have its finger on the pulse of Chinese lending. But its customers are hardly likely to stick around for long if they feel that any really useful information, the confidential stuff, is being leaked to Ms Woertz.

Time to act

The best thing that can be said for the

investment

is that it is limited to $100m.

That's relatively small in terms of ADM, a company with a market value of $16.6bn, and comfortably low borrowings.

But it is enough to warrant shareholders demanding an explanation from Ms Woertz, and a target for the return she expects on the investment, if only to make sure she thinks twice before coming up with an ever zanier scheme.

By Agrimoney.com

Twitter Linkedin
Related Stories

Morning markets: Grains stage a recovery. Will it last?

Corn, soybean and wheat futures start Wednesday making headway which has been difficult to come by of late. Cotton gains too

Evening markets: ags overlook crumbs of comfort in Wasde to set fresh historic low

The Bcom ag commodity subindex ends at a fresh record low, as US export fears overtake upbeat interpretations of corn, cotton estimate revisions

Abares lifts hopes for sugar futures, but cuts its cotton price forecast

A downgrade to Australia curtails an upgrade in world sugar output expectations. But for cotton, Abares ditches ideas of a global production deficit

Evening markets: Ags poop party lifting other commodities, shares

Wheat futures set another contract low, while arabica coffee hits its weakest close but one in 19 months, despite buying in other asset classes
Home | About | RSS | Commodities | Companies | Markets | Legal disclaimer | Privacy policy | Contact

Our Brands: Comtell | Feedinfo | FGInsight

© Agrimoney.com 2017

Agrimoney.com and Agrimoney are trademarks of Agrimoney Ltd
Agrimoney is part of the Briefing Media group
Agrimoney Ltd is registered in England & Wales. Registered number: 09239069