Linked In
News In
Linked In

You are viewing your 1 complimentary article.

Register now to receive full access.

Already registered?

Login | Join us now

Margin prospects 'better for beef packers than pork processors'

Twitter Linkedin eCard

Margin prospects look better for US beef processors than their peers in pork, where profitability will be held back by the boost to competition for hogs from fresh packing plants, MetLife Agricultural Finance said.

Prospects for US meatpackers in both sectors should be promising this year, given the trend for them to thrive in periods of expanding volumes.

"As farmers expand their herds in response to a period of above-average profitability, a greater supply of animals enter the system and allow downstream segments, like packers and retailers, to capture a larger share of every retail dollar," said MetLife, a major agricultural insurer.

"The opposite tends to occur during periods of declining animal numbers."

Capacity factor

And with US beef output to rise by 4.1% to 26.25bn pounds this year, and pork production by 4.3% to 26.11bn pounds, according to the US Department of Agriculture, this would "suggest that processors will continue to capture a greater share of every retail dollar".

However, this dynamic will "not hold true for pork", MetLife said, flagging the impact of new processing plants from the likes of Seaboard Foods and Triumph Foods, which are forecast raising industry capacity by 6% by the end of this year compared with 2015 levels.

This implies more competition for animals to process, underpinning hog prices.

"Greater slaughter capacity will likely return leverage back to the producer, impacting the share of retail pork prices captured," MetLife said.

However, with "no prospect" of an increase in beef packing capacity, an industry which has seen plant numbers decline in line with shrinkage in the US herd, "beef processors will likely retain a greater share of retail beef prices in 2017".

Contrasting evidence

Such talk will be reassuring to beef packers, which actually saw a weak start to 2017, when their margins shrank, pressed by recovering cattle values at a time of stagnant beef prices.

US beef and (pork) processor's falling take, as % of retail value

February: 5.9%, (17.4%)

January: 7.2%, (20.4%)

December: 9.9%, (22.5%)

November: 9.2%, (23.2%)

October: 11.0%, (21.2%)

September: 10.6%, (21.1%)

Source: USDA

For pork, the proportion of retail value taken by packers also fell last month, but to a relatively high 17.4%.

While below the high of 23.2% recorded in November, that is nonetheless amongst the highest levels seen since the early 1980s.

Strong import demand for the meat from China is seen as having supported pork processing margins against rising US output.



More information on dynamics in the beef industry will be revealed later, with monthly USDA data on cattle on US feedlots, expected to show a drop of 1.2% in placements in February, according to Urner Barry.

Forecasts for USDA cattle on feed report, March 24

On feed

, March 1: 100.1%, (10.781m head)

Range of estimates: 99.1-100.8%

Placed on feed

during February: 98.8%, (1.689m head)

Range of estimates: 94.0-103.5%


during February: 103.5%, (1.647m head)

Range of estimates: 102.5-104.0%

Data given as % of year-ago figure, and implied headage figure

Source: Urner Barry


ve to a year ago, and that likely has caused some analysts to expect a bit of a pause in placements during the month of February," said Len Steiner at Steiner Consulting.

The number of cattle marketed by feedlots last month, by contrast, is seen up 3.5% year on year.

Indeed, the "front end cattle supply remains very tight," Mr Steiner said, estimating that the number of cattle on feed for longer than 120 days, as of March 1, was down 16% year on year.

By Mike Verdin

Twitter Linkedin eCard
Related Stories

Morning markets: Wheat futures stage notable rebound. Other ags less so

Downbeat US crop ratings help wheat futures to respectable revivals, after the last session’s plunge. But trade war worries slow corn, soy, cotton recoveries

Evening markets: Wheat futures plunge limit down, as funds close ag bets en masse

Hard red winter wheat tumbles 6.0% at one point, after rains refresh US crops. Argentine rains hurt soybeans too. But fund flight benefits some ags

Extent of hedge funds' grain buying rings alarm bells, but in softs...

Hedge funds raise bullish positioning in grain futures and options to the highest in a year. But has selling in coffee and sugar primed prices for gains?

Hedge fund positions in numbers, for week to March 13

Markets extra lists the latest official data on hedge fund positions in ag commodity derivatives, and how they have changed week on week
Home | About | RSS | Commodities | Companies | Markets | Legal disclaimer | Privacy policy | Contact

Our Brands: Comtell | Feedinfo | FGInsight

© 2017 and Agrimoney are trademarks of Agrimoney Ltd
Agrimoney is part of AgriBriefing Ltd
Agrimoney Ltd is registered in England & Wales. Registered number: 09239069